Think you can beat AI? Take our test.

Humark challenges are built from real A/B tests with significant results, so there is a right answer. The same question goes to the leading models, and your profile shows which ones you beat and where you do not.

Take oneOne challenge, about thirty seconds

Free to play. Verification takes three rounds.

Paid social creative · DTC skincaredemo data
Creative A: Studio product shot of a frosted glass serum bottle on a stone plinth, headline reading calm skin in 14 days
Creative A
Creative B: Hand-held amber serum bottle with a dropper over a bathroom sink, headline reading my 3-step morning routine
Creative B
Which got the higher click-through rate?

Every challenge has a receipt.

Paid social ad showing a hand holding a serum bottle at a bathroom sink

Paid social creative

Ground truth is click-through rate from a split test on live paid placements.

min. 50,000 impressions per arm, p < 0.05

Two outdoor video thumbnails: a camping stove at sunrise titled one week off grid, and a gear flatlay titled what I packed

Video thumbnails

Ground truth is click-through from a thumbnail test on the same video.

min. 20,000 impressions per variant, p < 0.05

Four-step checkout screen on a laptop showing a shipping address form and order summary in dollars

Checkout drop-off

Ground truth is the step with the highest measured abandonment in funnel data.

min. 10,000 sessions, p < 0.05

If a test did not reach significance, it does not become a challenge. There is no panel of experts deciding who was right.

74% across 42. The models got 68%.

Scorecarddemo data

You

74%

31 / 42 correct

Model average

68%

same 42 challenges

Paid social creative

81%

16 challenges · ahead of all three models

Email subject lines

52%

9 challenges · behind all three models

Model comparisondemo data

Paid social creative

you
81%
model A
75%
model B
62%
model C
69%

Email subject lines

you
52%
model A
67%
model B
56%
model C
78%

Model identities are published on each challenge's result page.

You will be worse than the models at something. That is useful information and it stays on your profile.

Two monitors showing abstract analytics dashboards on a desk, seen from behind an office chair

Ten right is luck. Thirty across three rounds is not.

Verification track · round 2 of 3demo data
  1. Round 1

    75%

    complete

  2. Round 2

    74% running

    complete

  3. Round 3

    unseen set

    pending

threshold 70%74% held, rounds 1 and 2

Verification requires holding above 70% across three rounds of unseen challenges.

2%

top of the pool

~70%

held status next year

The Good Judgment Project found its superforecasters by skimming the top 2% of a large public pool, and roughly 70% of them held that status the following year. Humark works the same way. Fresh challenges, unseen, and verification only for people who hold their edge.

Source: the Good Judgment Project. External research, not Humark data.

Companies search the verified pool.

Verified participants opt in. Recruiters search by skill and by model comparison, so a brief reads like top 1% at predicting paid social winners, beats every model tested on DTC creative. Participants are paid for their time on commissioned challenges and we take a fee from the company, never from you.

DTC skincare · paid socialA 1.27% · B 1.79%

184,000 impressions. p < 0.01. Demo data.

Take one and see.

Thirty seconds, one real test, and three models answering the same question.